1樓：Mr.J
不知道「連用」指的是什麼，這裡兩個ed形式是完全不同的。
seemed 是動詞seem（看起來）的過去式：
現在：These forms not only seem ...
過去：These forms not only seemed ...
designed是動詞design（設計）的過去分詞，表示被動 ，（被）設計出來：
These forms not only seemed designed to shock people
These forms not only seemed (that they were) designed to shock people
2樓：adamlam99
1. Firstly, let me focus on your question.
The first 「verb」 「seemed」 is indeed a Verb, and more specifically a Linking Verb (聯絡動詞).
A Linking Verb must be followed by one of the two parts of speech:
(1) a Noun/Noun Phrase or
(2) an Adjective/Adjective Phrase.
In this case, 「designed to shock people」 is an Adjective Phrase with the following components:
「designed」: Past Participle Adjective; and
「to shock people」: Infinitive Adverbial Phrase modifying 「designed」.
In other words, 「designed」 is not a Verb, but an Adjective used to modify the Subject Noun Phrase 「forms」.
2. Secondly, this sentence is not grammatically correct.
The expression 「not only」 cannot be finished with an abrupt period 「 . 「.
You can either:
a. Follow this clause by another clause using 「but also」:
These forms not only seemed designed to shock people, but also, they are confusing.
If you want to indicate there are more words to come but not listed, you can use an ellipsis (which is made up of three dots 「 … 」
These forms not only seemed designed to shock people…
3樓：豌豆先生
這就是為什麼不應該用「ed形式」、「ing形式」這種說法。
前面的seemed是過去時謂語
後面那個是去分詞做主語補語，或者叫做表語
另外，這個not only一般不拿出來單用；通常必須跟but also形成並列。
英語中動詞可以連用嗎？
魚頭 雖然沒有話，但是兩個單詞可以連用，比如He walked there and picked up a coin.他走到那兒揀起一枚硬幣，連詞可以使兩個謂語都合理。但是沒有連詞就得把第二個改成非謂語ing形式，比如He walked there，picking up a coin。 楊媽 準確應...
西語使役動詞與自復動詞連用導致賓語重複可否省略其一？
Eloy 瀉藥 這其實是賓語成分和自復動詞沒搞清楚的問題，和使役動詞關係不大。句中的主語是 我 yo 省略掉了 核心動詞是hacer，sentirse動詞原形作賓語 間接賓語是 你 a ti 使用代詞te替代。而sentirse中的se也是間接賓語啊，所以本來間接賓語就都是同乙個te，所以並沒什麼問...
為什麼數詞三五能夠連用
迷途書僮 三五這兩個數最基本最原始的用法估計是三才和五行。其他的配用估計都衍生自這兩個配搭，比如三綱五常，三皇五帝，三墳五典等。但似乎與三五連用現象扯不上關係。正如前面答友所言，三五作成語，往往與輪次回合有關。如 隔三差五 三番五次 三令五申 三年五載 挨三頂五 攢三聚五。如此看來，倒可聯絡到節氣 ...